Succession Is Not a Retirement Plan. It’s a Business Strategy.
By Trevor Baker
Succession Is Not a Retirement Plan. It’s a Business Strategy.
Most mid-market business owners do not wake up thinking about succession planning. They are thinking about growth, customers, margins, talent, and the thousand moving parts that keep a company running.
And that is exactly why succession planning gets delayed.
In our work with privately held and founder-led organizations across Canada, we see the same pattern repeatedly. Leadership transitions are treated as future events rather than present strategies. The assumption is that there will be time to deal with it later.
There often is not.
Succession Is a Governance Issue
Succession planning is not simply about retirement. It is about protecting enterprise value, maintaining continuity, and ensuring leadership depth. It belongs at the board and ownership level, not just in HR.
Strong succession planning means:
- Developing leadership bench strength well before it is needed
- Clarifying what the next phase of leadership requires
- Maintaining awareness of external talent markets
- Building transition plans that protect culture and performance
When succession is approached proactively, businesses preserve momentum, humanity and security. When it is reactive, businesses expose themselves to unnecessary risk. This risk takes form in operational discontinuity, and through an HR lens, employee insecurity.
A Cautionary Tale: Anchor Brewing
Anchor Brewing was a respected, mid-sized, heritage brand with deep customer loyalty and a strong identity. Ownership changes occurred. Leadership continuity weakened. Strategic clarity eroded. Eventually, operations ceased in 2023.
The lesson is not about the decline in craft beer. It is about leadership stability.
Brand equity cannot compensate for leadership drift. When succession is unclear or fragmented, even admired companies can lose direction. Value erosion often happens quietly before it becomes visible.
An Example of Getting It Right: Lee Valley Tools
Contrast that with Lee Valley Tools, the Ottawa-based consumer goods company known for quality and craftsmanship. Founder Leonard Lee transitioned leadership intentionally to his son Robin Lee over time. It was not abrupt. It was structured.
The company preserved its culture, customer trust, and operational discipline through the transition. Growth continued because succession was phased, deliberate, and aligned with long-term strategy.
On a personal note, I own a set of Lee Valley wood carving tools that I admire more than I actually use. They sit in my workshop as a reminder that brands endure when stewardship is thoughtful. That continuity does not happen by accident.
What This Means for Mid-Market Businesses
In companies under 300 employees, leadership is often closely tied to founder identity. That is a strength. It can also be a vulnerability if no structured path forward exists.
Effective succession planning includes:
- Identifying internal successors early and investing in development
- Determining if outside talent needs to be considered, and building a recruitment plan
- Benchmarking external leadership profiles to understand market standards
- Structuring phased transitions rather than abrupt handovers
- Ensuring governance clarity around decision rights and accountability
Even when the intention is to promote internally, external market insight protects against blind spots.
The Cost of Waiting
When succession is delayed until urgency forces action, companies face compressed timelines, limited candidate pools, internal disruption, and avoidable risk. The risk is a cancer that can erode everything the business stands for.
When succession is treated as strategy, companies protect valuation, preserve culture, and sustain growth.
At MacDonald Search Group, we work with leadership teams who want to think ahead rather than react. Succession planning is not about replacing someone. It is about strengthening the organization before change is required.
Leadership transitions will happen. The only question is whether they will be controlled and strategic, or rushed and reactive.
If you are beginning to think about what the next generation of leadership looks like for your business, that conversation is worth having now, not later.